Empathy is a strange
thing, because of how it comes out. If your kid gets cut, you try to sooth him
and help him, because you know what it's like, but if you are a soldier, and
you shoot an enemy soldier, you might not feel empathy for him. Why is it that
shooting hundreds of people from another country because your government wants
oil, or money, or even something as broad and ridiculous as world power, why is
that perfectly fine, but something as simple as taking a loaf of bread because
your family is starving, is considered a sin that has to punished. I find it
horrifying that people are forced to go to war, and kill human beings, and
people just sit back and pretend as if it's a game, like Risk, and they're just
sending their pieces from the U.S. to somewhere like Iraq. It's so horrible
that people don't consider the civilians that will die if they do these things.
The fact that this happens every day is sad, because people in the midst of it,
that are civilians, and have nothing to do with the wars besides the fact that
it happens to be in their country, those people can't do anything about it.
~
Ryan age 13 ~ July 20, 2010
Postscript: My youngest son, Ryan, wrote this and allowed me to use it in my honors thesis later that year. He has allowed me to use it again now for this blog. He's decided to add on some of his current thoughts:
***
In
looking back at what I wrote that I felt that I should expand on it seeing as
it is short and not as inclusive as a piece about something like empathy should
be. I left out a very important subject, one which goes on at a smaller scale,
and in the very places we live. Something a person can maybe relate to more if
they aren't in a war-ridden country such as Afghanistan or Iraq. The issue of
poverty.
Some
years back my brother, my mom and I read a book called The Moral
Underground: How Ordinary Americans Subvert an Unfair Economy. In this book
Lisa Dodson talks about single mothers in lower-class conditions trying to
raise their children in the best ways possible. She talks about how this often
means having to work multiple jobs and not being able to spend much time with
their children; at the same time their own conditions of health are
deteriorating because of simple problems like sleep-deprivation. I read this
book and really empathize with these people. And not a simple 'wow that's
terrible' empathizing. I really feel like I want to do my fullest to help these
people and I feel (tho I have been raised in somewhat better conditions) that I
can relate to certain elements of this. I hear these people's personal stories
and I know how they feel about their conditions, and I hear about how they are
forced into situations in which they hardly are able to spend time with even
their own children; I hear these stories on a personal level, and I really feel
like these people are expressing their feeling to me. That is when I empathize
with these people most.
In
her book, Lisa Dodson tells about a mother who has two children, neither of
which are even teenagers at the time, and how the mother has been forced into
an economic situation where she close to never sees her kids. She leaves them
at various friends' and relatives' houses during the majority of the week. But
then there are a few days a month in which she has nowhere for them to go, and
so they have to stall and find reasons to stay at their school for an extended
amount of time until she can pick them up. This amounts to around 2 hours where
they have to sit by themselves outside of their school and wait for her. I
don't just feel sorry for her and her children, I imagine what that must be
like, I get a very vivid picture of the experience because this person's story
is told so personally, and the emotion is somewhat captured in her story, and
then I empathize on a deep, intellectual, and emotional level with these
people. And I wish because of this empathy that I can do the absolute most in
my power to help these people. Sadly, in my current situation and age, I can do
very close to nothing to help people in these situations.
In
another part of the book, she talks about a restaurant manager who, seemingly,
deeply empathizes with several single moms working under her employment; and to
help she takes the risk of losing her job by letting these mothers bring their
kids into work so they can sit and study or read and have somewhere to be while
their parents are working. Why is it though, that such a simple (and in a way
noble) act is even considered risky? Why is a good action like this something
she can be punished for? Why does our system almost seem to want these
poor, single mothers and their children to stay in such horrible conditions?
Why
are the ones chosen for the position of being able to stop such injustices
people who don't seem to empathize as deeply with these families? I do not
think that at heart these are all bad people, but that they have been conditioned
by a capitalist system, one that idolizes the ownership of something as
meaningless as paper money, or even virtual money - not even a
real object, but an abstract concept - it is because of this system and because
the position they are put in gives them more of this "abstract
concept," that they do not empathize. They choose to block off those
thoughts, because they like what they have. And even if they feel a bit guilty,
they still own these things, and like them; so they numb their own senses to
these feelings of empathy so they can keep these objects. Nonetheless, just
because I understand their motives - and I suppose in a way I empathize with
them - that does not mean that they're morally correct motives.
Veering
a bit away from Lisa Dodson's book: I recently started reading the
semi-biography, Jay-Z Decoded. Now, if somebody were to just hear
the name, (and of course if they know who Jay-Z is - which I have faith a large
number of people reading this do - ) they might think that this book wouldn't
have much value on this subject. The very fact that it is about a currently
rich and famous rapper may encourage somebody who is somewhat unknowing on the
subject to think that it wouldn't be intellectually important. But in the beginning
of this book he talks about his upbringing in a poor neighborhood in Brooklyn.
He talks about how a large number of people in his neighborhood turned to drug
dealing. But not for the money, not at first. The original reason for it is to
help support their families.
I
empathize with him and people he knew on this subject, because although once
again I have been brought up in somewhat better conditions, I know the feeling
of watching my family struggle with economic problems. I myself am trying to
decide whether to try for getting PSEO at a community college this year or
applying for a job to both help myself start what I hope to be a successful
career in music, and to try to help pay for basic requirements of living so my
family can keep our house and live a little easier.
Waw! I love this piece RaiRai. I like what you said about the single mothers. The questions you posed are important, but, unfortunately, unanswerable. I also like what you wrote about occupying other countries under the pretext of liberating them from dictators, a scenario that is being repeated now in Syria where the US pretends to help Syrians while the main objective is to occupy its territory in order to help Israel, to hit Iran and to better control the region and its oil. These selfish and imperialist intentions are always hidden under the noble slogan of liberating the oppressed. Here, the American government calls for the empathy of its people. Here, the empathy of Americans is felt, but it is almost never felt and never called for when the issue is the real economic drives or the human cost of the American occupation -they call it benevolent intervention- in foreign lands.
ReplyDeleteThanks! I'm glad you liked it.
ReplyDeleteI know, it's absurd that governments can pull off this crap over and over again for reasons that aren't even the real incentive.
Glad to know my childhood nickname is being spread throughout the internet, haha. I think I speak for all of us in saying we miss you, JiJi.