by Lucy S.
This is copied from some paper and pen
writing I did yesterday.
It is almost 4 pm and I am on the part
of the campus where I spent most of my time during the six semesters working on
my BA here. I rarely come here anymore, but a friend invited me to her thesis
defense. It was as funny, fragmented yet holistic, unpredictable, and poignant
as she is. I am glad I came.
I am also glad I came because being
here makes me confront the scarcities in this place that became so familiar,
but could not become home. Scarcities of fair material compensation; scarcities
of secure jobs for so many. Scarcities of teachers. Scarcities of active
concern for students; only so much of that to go around. Alienation and
bewilderment for others. Scarcities of time. Scarcities of warmth, friendship,
and deep, true education.
And those scarcities are for the people
granted temporary admittance as students; non-tenured PhD professors paid one
third or less what the tenured are paid for doing the same work; or longer term
residency as wage-slaves – adults systemically herded and economically blackmailed
into serving others. There is nothing mutual about it. The latter adults - the served - position themselves as indispensable to institutions where people come together
to learn; after all, how could anyone there function without the two
hundred-plus upper level administrators all making over $200,000 per year? But I feel so tired of talking about that
fact. They do it because they can; it’s that simple. This will continue and get
much worse as long as most people let it.
For most people in the communities around
our "public" university, the scarcities manifest as constructed barriers to
entry. Structural rationing. The institution does not exist to serve the people
of this state; it exists to serve itself. But who or what is ‘itself’? By what
logic is it operating?
It is a beautiful mid-May day, sunny,
not too humid, temperature in the low 80s. The breezes are not scarce; they at least are not organized and
doled out by this institution. On this campus, with so many breezy, shady
spots, there is almost nowhere to just sit down in the shade. There are four
metal tables which each seat four people, chained to the ground near the
library, and they are taken. They’ve always been popular sitting spots. Up a
few steps from the broad space between the two lines of buildings facing each
other, so many metal tables and chairs sit chained to the concrete in the sun
with no trees around. When it is cold during our frigid upper Midwest winters
that can go on so long, it is even colder there with the wind blowing beyond
the shelter of the rows of buildings. When it is hot, it is scorching there
with the concrete reflecting the heat back up and the sun beating unrelievedly
down. Reading or writing is difficult in the glare and wind. Even on relatively
mild days like this, it is hot there. There is no scarcity of tables. But there
is a scarcity of thought and of care that materializes in these placements. Few
people sit at these tables, now or ever.
I keep walking, cross a small street,
and find a smaller group of tables, also in the sun. Finally, I decide to sit
on this bench height concrete ledge. It sits in the mottled shade near a
story-and-a-half high concrete structure the size of a small home which may
house electrical or mechanical equipment. It blocks the breeze. My back hurts
if I sit here too long. (I know from other times I sat here when I was a
student.)
This scarcity of seating is of course
not tragic. But it speaks to an alienation here between the needs of so many of
the people who work and learn here and the people who make most of the
decisions, but have their own tables and seats and spaces to suit their needs
and desires far better than these suit the majority’s. And it speaks not only
to manufactured scarcities, but to waste and weird contrasts. Multimillion
dollar building remodels, but no tables can be moved from the barren concrete
area to places where people would actually use them. Fresh air and beautiful days are wasted when
people retreat indoors to find a place to sit to do their reading and writing.
Friendships that might have formed outside...
During my time here, I often found it
difficult to find places to sit and talk with people. Maybe the upper
layer did not want us to loiter too long and get the mistaken impression that
this place belonged to us. In the icy winters, we sometimes sat on floors
against the walls in buildings with vast wide open spaces for tables and
chairs. Couldn’t the metal tables be placed in there? Where are they stored
during winter?
There are many trees; spreads of green
grass (which you might sit on – but mind the signs telling you that poison has
recently been applied again to kill the weeds); walkways; classic Greek-style
buildings (one of them just had a $32 million remodel); and even tables and
benches. If you don’t linger, and you don’t try to find a place to sit, it looks
appealing. If you don’t need shelter from the sun or cold, you may find it
charming, driving by.
If you don’t need an abiding welcome or
friendship here, then walking through may elicit from you some yearnings for
your own bygone college days or your stereotypes about what college would have
been like, had you gone.
It is only two-and-a-half years since I
graduated from here.
After the thesis defense, as I slowly
made my way out of the room after congratulating my friend, I got stuck near a
professor while I waited to walk out of the door. For my second to last and then
last semesters, I was in two of his classes, both small. His eyes landed on me
with a look of startled recognition; he then looked away quickly, then turned himself
around facing away. I’d always felt that he disliked me when I was in his
classes. Still, I found it strange that he wouldn't even just say, "Hey,
Lucy, how're you doing?" as a quick casual greeting. I didn't feel overtly
upset, at least not at all like those things used to upset me when I was a
student here. But it made me finally, fully accept that I don’t like this man.
Scarcities of respect; scarcities of real
kindness; scarcities of an ability to value other perspectives and lives that
don’t fit well enough into some people’s bland, neat little parameters.
I am tired of giving people like him
the benefit of the doubt.
[And yet, a day later, copying this
from my notebook, I feel myself slide again into: “What if he just didn’t
recognize me? What if he thought that I didn’t like him? What if he had
something else on his mind?”]
For most of my life, I’ve separated
from my own perspective too much, as if I could somehow be (or had a
responsibility to be) omniscient. Even if people acted cold or disdainful or
mean toward me, I would see them separate from that to some extent. I’d think,
well, maybe I'm just not their kind of person; maybe I remind them of someone
they had a bad experience with; maybe they think I don’t like them. That may
stem from all the years I lived with so many people, and from reading so much,
and from knowing that so many people are convinced they’re right when they’re
sometimes so wrong. What if I’m wrong? And everyone has reasons and stories. But
now, I want to stay attached to myself. I’m not omniscient.
Because of these personal tendencies and
my own position when I was a student in that university, I struggled with how
to stand up for myself, even inside my own mind.
Scarcities of true, abiding
relationships there – relationships I could count on – real friends. That was
particularly true my first three semesters there. I felt both alone and conspicuous.
I hated being the only ‘nontraditional’ student in most of my classes. When I
went back for the second half – the other three semesters – all of that got
better. But the friendships I made were with people who like me were not
granted full citizenship rights. From the administration’s view, we were there
to pay tuition or exploit as cheap labor. Customers or wage-slaves. There were so many
more of us than of them, but there was a scarcity of understanding for how deeply problematic the situation was, and a scarcity of belief that anything
could be done, and a scarcity of interest in developing our collective strength
and taking our university from the layer who have appropriated it.
And now writing the day after I was
there:
The upcoming plan for that research 1
university is to make it more elitist. Acceptance there is set to become an
even scarcer resource in 2015. The administrative dictators want more students
from out of state so they can charge them higher tuition. In turn, students
from this state can go elsewhere and take out even larger student loans. Instead
of paying $50,000 for four years of BA instruction at this so-called public
university, they can pay $80,000 or $100,000 somewhere else. Or they can try to
go to the four-year state institution that won’t have enough space to accommodate
a new mass of students who can’t get into our “public” university.
More students may find themselves far away
from everyone they have ties to, as grad students and professors are likewise
more than ever ripped away from their family, old friends, communities they
grew up in.
In Debt:
the First 5000 Years, David Graeber writes:
To be a slave was to be plucked from one’s family, kin,
friends, and community, stripped of one’s name, identity, and dignity; and of
everything that made one a person rather than a mere human machine capable of
understanding orders. Neither were most slaves offered much opportunity to develop
enduring human relations (155).
In a human economy, each person is unique, and of
incomparable value, because each is a unique nexus of relations with others. A
woman may be a daughter, sister, lover, rival, companion, mother, age-mate, and
mentor to many different people in different ways (158.
[T]o make a human being an object of exchange, one woman
equivalent to another for example, requires first of all ripping her from her
context; that is, tearing her away from that web of relations that makes her
the unique conflux of relations that she is, and thus, into a means to measure
debt (159).
I am not speaking strictly of slavery here, but of that
process that dislodges people from the webs of mutual commitment, shared
history, and collective responsibility that make them what they are, so as to
make them exchangeable – that is, to make it possible to make them subject to
the logic of debt. Slavery is just the logical end-point, the most extreme form
of such disentanglement. (163)
Are we being educated into slavery?
Freedom becomes even more of a scarcity under these conditions. People aren’t free to choose to study what they want to study, or to stay near loved ones, sharing what they learn, or to make choices that cannot be made when they owe $50,000 or $100,000 in student loan debt.
Freedom becomes even more of a scarcity under these conditions. People aren’t free to choose to study what they want to study, or to stay near loved ones, sharing what they learn, or to make choices that cannot be made when they owe $50,000 or $100,000 in student loan debt.
Graeber again:
The meaning of the Roman word libertas itself changed dramatically over time. As everywhere in
the ancient world, to be “free” meant, first and foremost, not to be a slave.
Since slavery means above all the annihilation of social ties and the ability
to form them, freedom meant the capacity to make and maintain moral commitments
to others. The English word for “free,” for instance, is derived from a German
root meaning “friend,” since to be free meant to be able to make friends, to keep
promises, to live within a community of equals” (203).
I love this. To be free is to be able to make friends.
Scarcities of freedom and friendship abound at my former university. This helps prepare us for scarcities of freedom and friendship in our larger society, all tied to other scarcities.
Scarcities of freedom and friendship abound at my former university. This helps prepare us for scarcities of freedom and friendship in our larger society, all tied to other scarcities.
On my way out, I detoured through one
of the old classical buildings where my American literature class used to meet
in a big lecture hall in spring semester of 2010. I looked through the door’s
glass into the empty room with the lights on. And I saw the ghosts of better
possibilities. In the midst of all the constraints to keep us unfree – to prevent
us from forming and keeping old and new webs of sustained relations – we were more
in there than they tried to force us into being. Maybe one day, we’ll cut the
chains on the tables and move them as it suits us, free to make and keep and sit
with friends in OUR university. Scarcity will give way to generosity and
abundance.
No comments :
Post a Comment