by Lucy S.
This will
be quick and informal because I am now in the throes once again of my work for
the upcoming semester. Well, quick for me may not mean short, because I find
that it takes far longer to write something shorter than to type quickly, rambling
away from thought to thought. (Thus Mark Twain famously wrote that if he’d had
more time, he would have written a shorter letter…) I have modified this blog’s
name, as you will see, from “Bear Down” to “Labor 2 Bear Down.” This is in part
because it matches the site address, and partly because there are umpteen blogs
called Bear Down (something I realize, in retrospect, was bound to be the
case), but also because I want to emphasize the labor which brings us to and is
inherent in these various forms of bearing down to produce – create.
But I am interested in the question of what we
even mean by laboring. What constitutes labor?
Is it labor only if someone pays us money for doing it? Is it labor only
if we dislike it? Is it labor only if we produce a material object? Is it labor
only when it benefits someone else rather than solely oneself? Is it labor only
when it meets the basic needs humans have to stay alive? What if someone labors
hard to support her/himself and perhaps their loved ones as well but the labor
produces something which has harmful effects on those who buy the product or on
the environment? Is this blog labor? I would really like to hear people’s thoughts on this. I think
we could benefit from some extended dialogue on this topic.
David
Graeber writes, near the end of his book Debt:
The First 5,000 Years:
I would like, then, to
end by putting in a good word for the non-industrious poor. At least they
aren't hurting anyone. Insofar as the time they are taking off from work is
being spent with friends and family, enjoying and caring for those they love,
they're probably improving the world more than we acknowledge. Maybe we should
think of them as pioneers of a new economic order that would not share our
current one's penchant for self-destruction (390).
I love him
for saying this (and I love that whole book). But I am wondering if “enjoying
and caring for those they love” constitute labor, too. If I am a first grade
teacher and read stories to my students during part of the day, is that labor? What
if I read stories to the neighbor’s daughter who I am paid to take care of?
What if I read to kids who are not my own and who I’m not paid to take care of,
but do so as a favor to their parents? What if I do it because I enjoy it, and
the parents are home? What if I read to my own kids? At what point is this labor and at what point
is it not? Is it labor if I am a paid
psychologist listening to clients talk about their life struggles and providing
feedback and suggestions, but not labor if these are friends or family who do
not pay me? Is it not labor if I then in
turn talk with them about my own struggles?
At the
same time, I do not want an interrogation of labor to result in a conclusion
which says that one person working in a grueling factory or harvesting job all
day is the same as another person reading stories to others, having lunch with
friends to talk over ideas and challenges, and so on. There is actual work that
must be done for our physical survival and for what we have decided are
necessities or highly desired extras. I believe ideally this work should be
shared and that it would not take up very much of anyone’s time if we all did
our part in the ways that we can and if we stopped producing the glut of junk
which does nothing to contribute to a better quality of life for anyone. But we
do not live in that ideal society. We
live out our real lives in our real societies, and the question I always have
is how to not just succumb to the same old so-called pragmatism which does
nothing to challenge the ruinous status quo while keeping serious change always
in some imaginary space inside of our wistful heads. How do we labor to labor
better? Is there a way to challenge these false divisions of labor in our real
lives now?
No comments :
Post a Comment